DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
SIN
Docket No: 4273-14
20 April 2015
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
tates Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 April 2015. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of
error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
Fter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injUstice .
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
6 November 1986. On 10 June 1987, you were diagnosed with a
chronic personality disorder. Subsequently, you were processed
for separation by reason of convenience of the government due to
the diagnosed personality disorder. After being afforded all of
your procedural rights your case was forwarded to the separation
authority recommending you receive a general discharge. On
12 August 1987, the separation authority directed that you
receive a general discharge. You were so discharged on 7 August
LSB 7.
The Board, in its review of your record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your short period of service , desire to upgrade your discharge,
and belief that your character of service would change after a
few years. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
given your diagnosed personality disorder. Further, you are
advised that there is no provision of law or in Navy regulations
that allows for recharacterization of a discharge automatically
after few months or due solely to the passage of tine.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within,one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is#evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sinceyely
OBERT J. O'NEILL
Fxecutive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5751 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR494 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5104 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. Navy regulations authorize an uncharacterized entry level separation if the processing of a Sailor’s separation begins within 180 days of his entry on active auty Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08452-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 8 October 1986. You received a second nonjudicial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5464 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02567-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 13 January 1987. Subsequently, you received two...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11385-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, the Board concluded that the severity of your diagnosed personality disorder was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09533-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2005. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11716-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your general discharge because of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08781-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...